频 道 直 达 - 新闻 - 读书 - 培训 - 教程 - 前沿 - 组网 - 系统应用 - 安全 - 编程 - 存储 - 操作系统 - 数据库 - 服务器 - 专题 - 产品 - 案例库 - 技术圈 - 博客 - BBS
51CTO.COM_中国领先的IT技术网站
首页>>组网建网>>cisco专区>>思科技术>>配置实例>>
找资料：

ipv6 的rip路由配置

作者: 出处:Cisco.com　 (  ) 砖  (  ) 好  评论 ( ) 条 　进入论坛
更新时间：2006-07-03 10:54
关 键 词：Cisco配置实例
阅读提示： 

Rack01R3#sh ru int lo10
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 104 bytes
!
interface Loopback10
no ip address
ipv6 address 2003::3/64
ipv6 enable
ipv6 rip Cisco enable
end
Rack01R3#sh ru int e0 
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 103 bytes
!
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
ipv6 address 2001::3/64
ipv6 enable
ipv6 rip Cisco enable
end
(config)#
!
ipv6 unicast-routing
!
!
ipv6 router rip Cisco
!

-------------------------------(debug info)-------------------------------------------

*Mar  1 00:51:33.019: RIPng: Triggered update requested
*Mar  1 00:51:33.775: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
Rack01R1#
*Mar  1 00:51:34.019: RIPng: generating triggered update for Cisco
*Mar  1 00:51:34.019: RIPng: Sending multicast update on Ethernet0 for Cisco
*Mar  1 00:51:34.023:        src=FE80::260:5CFF:FEF4:CD0A
*Mar  1 00:51:34.027:        dst=FF02::9 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 00:51:34.027:        sport=521, dport=521, length=32
*Mar  1 00:51:34.031:        command=2, version=1, mbz=0, #rte=1
*Mar  1 00:51:34.031:        tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2001::/64
Rack01R1#
*Mar  1 00:51:46.987: RIPng: response received from FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813 on Ethernet0 for Cisco
*Mar  1 00:51:46.991:        src=FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 00:51:46.995:        dst=FF02::9
*Mar  1 00:51:46.995:        sport=521, dport=521, length=52
*Mar  1 00:51:46.999:        command=2, version=1, mbz=0, #rte=2
*Mar  1 00:51:46.999:        tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2001::/64
*Mar  1 00:51:47.003:        tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2003::/64
*Mar  1 00:51:47.003: RIPng: Added neighbour FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813/Ethernet0
*Mar  1 00:51:47.007: RIPng: Inserted 2001::/64, nexthop FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813, metric 2, tag 0
Rack01R1#
*Mar  1 00:51:47.015: RIPng: Inserted 2003::/64, nexthop FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813, metric 2, tag 0
*Mar  1 00:51:47.019: RIPng: Triggered update requested
*Mar  1 00:51:48.019: RIPng: generating triggered update for Cisco
*Mar  1 00:51:48.023: RIPng: Suppressed null multicast update on Ethernet0 for Cisco
Rack01R1#
*Mar  1 00:51:53.027: RIPng: Sending multicast update on Ethernet0 for Cisco
*Mar  1 00:51:53.031:        src=FE80::260:5CFF:FEF4:CD0A
*Mar  1 00:51:53.031:        dst=FF02::9 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 00:51:53.035:        sport=521, dport=521, length=52
*Mar  1 00:51:53.039:        command=2, version=1, mbz=0, #rte=2
*Mar  1 00:51:53.039:        tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2001::/64
*Mar  1 00:51:53.043:        tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2010::/64

------------------------(ipv6 route table)--------------------------------------

Rack01R1#sh ipv6 route ri
IPv6 Routing Table - 6 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
U - Per-user Static route
I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
R   2003::/64 [120/2]
via FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813, Ethernet0

解释:
环境为R1-----R3的E0口连接,分别启用loopback10接口,在全局模式下启用ipv6 unicast-routing ，和ipv6 rip 路由进程；在接口启用ipv6 enable,并且在接口启用ipv6 rip的路由。需要注意的地方，ipv6 rip Cisco, Cisco是进程的表示。在接口下的rip路由要与进程中的表识相同，并且大小写敏感。
ipv6 ICMP debug 
*Mar  1 01:10:02.651: IPv6: SAS picked source 2010::1 for 2003::3 (Loopback10)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.655: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.659: IPv6: nexthop FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813,
*Mar  1 01:10:02.663: IPV6: source 2010::1 (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.667:       dest 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.667:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+0, prot 58, hops 64, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:02.671: IPv6: Sending on Ethernet0
*Mar  1 01:10:02.679: IPV6: source 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.683:       dest 2010::1
*Mar  1 01:10:02.683:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+14, prot 58, hops 64, forward to ulp
*Mar  1 01:10:02.687: ICMPv6: Received ICMPv6 packet from 2003::3, type 129
*Mar  1 01:10:02.691: ICMPv6: Received echo reply from 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.695: IPv6: SAS picked source 2010::1 for 2003::3 (Loopback10)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.699: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.703: IPv6: nexthop FE80::250:73FF:FE6C
Rack0:6813,
*Mar  1 01:10:02.707: IPV6: source 2010::1 (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.711:       dest 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.711:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+0, prot 58, hops 64, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:02.715: IPv6: Sending on Ethernet0
*Mar  1 01:10:02.723: IPV6: source 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.723:       dest 2010::1
*Mar  1 01:10:02.727:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+14, prot 58, hops 64, forward to ulp
*Mar  1 01:10:02.727: ICMPv6: Received ICMPv6 packet from 2003::3, type 129
*Mar  1 01:10:02.731: ICMPv6: Received echo reply from 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.739: IPv6: SAS picked source 2010::1 for 2003::3 (Loopback10)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.743: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.747: IPv6: nexthop FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813,
*Mar  1 01:10:02.747: IPV6: source 2010::1 (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.751:       dest 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.755:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+0, prot 58, hops 64, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:02.755: IPv6: Sending on Ethernet0
*Mar  1 01:10:02.763: IPV6: source 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.767:       dest 2010::1
*Mar  1 01:10:02.767:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+14, prot 58, hops 64, forward to ulp
*Mar  1 01:10:02.771: ICMPv6: Received ICMPv6 packet from 2003::3, type 129
*Mar  1 01:10:02.775: ICMPv6: Received echo reply from 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.779: IPv6: SAS picked source 2010::1 for 2003::3 (Loopback10)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.783: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.787: IPv6: nexthop FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813,
*Mar  1 01:10:02.791: IPV6: source 2010::1 (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.791:       dest 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.795:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+0, prot 58, hops 64, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:02.799: IPv6: Sending on Ethernet0
*Mar  1 01:10:02.803: IPV6: source 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.807:       dest 2010::1
*Mar  1 01:10:02.807:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+14, prot 58, hops 64, forward to ulp
*Mar  1 01:10:02.811: ICMPv6: Received ICMPv6 packet from 2003::3, type 129
*Mar  1 01:10:02.815: ICMPv6: Received echo reply from 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.819: IPv6: SAS picked source 2010::1 for 2003::3 (Loopback10)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.823: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:02.827: IPv6: nexthop FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813,
*Mar  1 01:10:02.831: IPV6: source 2010::1 (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.831:       dest 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.835:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+0, prot 58, hops 64, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:02.839: IPv6: Sending on Ethernet0
*Mar  1 01:10:02.843: IPV6: source 2003::3 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:02.847:       dest 2010::1
*Mar  1 01:10:02.847:       traffic class 0, flow 0x0, len 100+14, prot 58, hops 64, forward to ulp
*Mar  1 01:10:02.851: ICMPv6: Received ICMPv6 packet from 2003::3, type 129
*Mar  1 01:10:02.855: ICMPv6: Received echo reply from 2003::3
*Mar  1 01:10:04.907: IPV6: source FE80::260:5CFF:FEF4:CD0A (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:04.911:       dest FF02::9 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:04.915:       traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 92+1408, prot 17, hops 255, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:04.915: IPv6: Sending on Ethernet0
*Mar  1 01:10:04.919: IPV6: source FE80::260:5CFF:FEF4:CD0A (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:04.923:       dest FF02::9 (Loopback10)
*Mar  1 01:10:04.927:       traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 112+1402, prot 17, hops 255, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:04.931: IPv6: Sending on Loopback101R1#
Rack01R1#
*Mar  1 01:10:07.679: IPV6: source FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:07.683:       dest FE80::260:5CFF:FEF4:CD0A
*Mar  1 01:10:07.683:       traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 72+14, prot 58, hops 255, forward to ulp
*Mar  1 01:10:07.687: ICMPv6: Received ICMPv6 packet from FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813, type 135
*Mar  1 01:10:07.691: IPV6: source FE80::260:5CFF:FEF4:CD0A (local)
*Mar  1 01:10:07.695:       dest FE80::250:73FF:FE6C:6813 (Ethernet0)
*Mar  1 01:10:07.699:       traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 64+16, prot 58, hops 255, originating
*Mar  1 01:10:07.703: IPv6: Sending on Ethernet0

Rack01R1#sh debugging
Generic IPv6:
ICMP packet debugging is on
IPv6 unicast packet debugging is on

发现在ping的时候发出的包是以环回地址为source,在ipv4中是以出站借口地址为source.这里有点不太理解。 

Rack01R3#deb ip icmp
ICMP packet debugging is on
Rack01R3#deb ip pa
IP packet debugging is on
Rack01R3#p 10.10.10.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.10.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

*Mar  1 01:14:20.459: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:20.463: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:14:20.471: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, encapsulation failed.!!!!
Success rate is 80 percent (4/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 24/27/28 ms
Rack01R3#
*Mar  1 01:14:22.459: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.463: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:14:22.475: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.479: IP: s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:14:22.483: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 10.10.10.1, dst 10.10.10.3
*Mar  1 01:14:22.487: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.491: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:14:22.503: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.507: IP: s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:14:22.511: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 10.10.10.1, dst 10.10.10.3
*Mar  1 01:14:22.519: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local)
Rack01R, d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.523: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:14:22.531: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.535: IP: s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:14:22.539: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 10.10.10.1, dst 10.10.10.3
*Mar  1 01:14:22.547: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.551: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:14:22.563: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:14:22.567: IP: s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:14:22.571: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 10.10.10.1, dst 10.10.10.33#

---------------------ipv4的ping--------------------------
Gateway of last resort is not set 

R    20.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 10.10.10.1, 00:00:05, Ethernet0
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       10.10.10.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
Rack01R3#deb ip icm
ICMP packet debugging is on
Rack01R3#deb ip pa
IP packet debugging is on
Rack01R3#p 20.20.20.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 20.20.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 24/26/28 ms
Rack01R3#

*Mar  1 01:16:53.891: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.895: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:16:53.907: IP: tableid=0, s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.911: IP: s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:16:53.915: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 20.20.20.1, dst 10.10.10.3
*Mar  1 01:16:53.923: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.927: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:16:53.935: IP: tableid=0, s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.939: IP: s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:16:53.947: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 20.20.20.1, dst 10.10.10.3
*Mar  1 01:16:53.951: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local)
Rack01, d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.955: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:16:53.967: IP: tableid=0, s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.971: IP: s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:16:53.975: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 20.20.20.1, dst 10.10.10.3
*Mar  1 01:16:53.983: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.987: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:16:53.995: IP: tableid=0, s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:53.999: IP: s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:16:54.007: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 20.20.20.1, dst 10.10.10.3
*Mar  1 01:16:54.011: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:54.015: IP: s=10.10.10.3 (local), d=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), len 100, sending
*Mar  1 01:16:54.027: IP: tableid=0, s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), routed via RIB
*Mar  1 01:16:54.031: IP: s=20.20.20.1 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.3 (Ethernet0), len 100, rcvd 3
*Mar  1 01:16:54.035: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 20.20.20.1, dst 10.10.10.3R3#
Rack01R3#
*Mar  1 01:16:56.211: IP: s=10.10.10.1 (Ethernet0), d=224.0.0.9, len 52, rcvd 2

（责任编辑：城尘 68476636-8003）


滚动新闻　术语词典　问题悬赏
发表
评论
共 条 查看
评价
叫个好
拍一砖
相关 专题 文档
相关 博客 帖子
相关 白皮书 资料
相关 讨论组 技术人
我也说两句

匿名发表

(如果看不清请点击图片进行更换)


中 国 领 先 的 IT 技 术 网 站 ·
技 术 成 就 梦 想
·NGN:下一代网络
·网络访问中断大排查
· Avaya股东批准私募基金..
· 分析师：惠普300亿美元..
· 3Com股价周五收盘大涨3..
 · Catalyst 6000/6500 系..
· Practice Lab 3:多路由..
· Route-map policy
 		  · 华为、贝恩资本22亿美..
· 五大方面谈什么是理想..
· 思科网真系统两年后可..
 · CISCO配置实例学习
· router多次死机，各位..
· CISCO设备经典配置大集..
排行榜
·路由器设置与口令恢复 (查看60640次)
·常用交换机典型配置 (查看36407次)
·网络管理员考试全真模拟试题(八.. (查看32855次)
·三层交换技术专题 (查看28555次)
·子网掩码教程 (查看25829次)
·国庆充电之IT培训认证
·51CTO主编推荐经典专题
· 51CTO“十·一”特别专..
· 对应需求 如何选择最合..
· SPEC：AMD四核浮点性能..
· FB-DIMM、RDDR3谁是服..
· Avaya股东批准私募基金..
· 未来游戏设计将要面临..
· 微软发布全新FTP7.0
· 网络嗅探教程：用Sniff..
   · 能够改变IT格局的五大..
· 微软统一沟通系列视频..
· 专家教你理解ARP欺骗攻..
· 微软屈从用户PC厂商压..
· 企业如何对付DDoS攻击 ..
· 思科称三年后网真系统..
· 北京歌华出现网络故障 ..
· 苹果与黑客大斗法 破解..
订阅技术快讯
查看样刊
电子杂志下载
名称：网络安全精品应用黄皮书
简介：《2007精品网络安全黄皮书》包括了9个大类24个小类， 800余篇文章，内容包含了熊猫烧香病毒、DDOS攻击、ARP病等热点问题的介绍及解决方案。从病毒查杀、防范、系统、数据等各方面的安全设置到黑客技术的了解、防范，涉及到了安全应用的全部领域, 由浅至深内容全面。
名称：Vista精品应用黄皮书
简介：《Vista精品应用黄皮书》囊括了Vista的各方面内容。此次的精简版，是将里面的内容做了提取，便于用户下载和使用。内容包含了各种Vista的安装与实施、技巧与解析以及各种Vista相关学习文档和相关软件的安全下载。该电子书是了解和应用Vista人员必备的工具手册，并且也是第一本
名称：2006中国IT论坛精品集合
简介：本书由“51CTO论坛推广联盟”制作完成。书中所有内容均来自各联盟成员的论坛（网站）。制作本书的目的是为了集中大家的优势资源，将更多更精彩的内容带给广大技术爱好者。本书是联盟成立以来制作的第一本书。
专题
51CTO国庆充电专题之好书推荐
51CTO国庆充电专题之好书推荐		网络技术经典基础教程
网络技术经典基础教程
· 51CTO主编推荐经典专题
· RAID——磁盘阵列基础
· 充电计划之热门IT认证..
· 51CTO技术自测 挑战自..
· CISSP认证成长之路
· AMD Phenom三核处理器..
· 国际文档格式标准开战
· 2007年互联网大会
 · 我是黑客我怕谁——讲..
· ARP攻击防范与解决方案
· Solaris 10 配置管理
· Solaris基础知识入门
· RIP路由协议专栏
· MPLS路由协议专栏
· OSPF路由协议专栏
· 思科路由器产品
Java编程开发手册
Java编程开发手册		Java基础教程
Java基础教程
· Java基础教程
· VPN技术
· ARP攻击防范与解决方案
· SQL Server 2005全解
· SOA 面向服务架构
· SQL Server 2005全解
· Java编程开发手册
· RAID——磁盘阵列基础
 · 三层交换技术专题
· SQL Server入门到精通
· Windows Server 2003企..
· Windows远程桌面应用
· C#技术开发指南
· VPN技术
· Solaris 10 配置管理
· C#技术开发指南
Java编程开发手册
Java编程开发手册		Java基础教程
Java基础教程
· ARP攻击防范与解决方案
· VPN技术
· SQL Server 2005全解
· Java基础教程
· SQL Server入门到精通
· SQL Server 2005全解
· SOA 面向服务架构
· Java编程开发手册
 · C#技术开发指南
· 三层交换技术专题
· C#技术开发指南
· Windows远程桌面应用
· RAID——磁盘阵列基础
· Windows Server 2003企..
· 邮件服务器专题
· wimax技术与趋势
专家
DB2 9技术资源中.. 推荐阅读  
·DB2 Viper快速入门
·DB2 9数据库的镜像分割与..		 ·将XML应用程序从DB2 8.x..
·DB2 9中的pureXML：如何..
51CTO.com编辑部.. 推荐阅读  
·服务器中的“傻瓜机”在..
·盖茨也喜欢登录Youtube看..		 ·
·
张振伦 的博客  
·拯救系统管理员
·美国选民：我为什么选布什		 ·VMware公司中文命名挑战赛
·我们真缺乏创新吗?
梁林 的博客  
·J0ker的CISSP之路：复习-..
·J0ker的CISSP之路:复习-I..		 ·9月第3周安全回顾 内网安..
·教你几招识别和防御Web网..
关键字阅读
频道精选
组网建网 安全频道
· NGN:下一代网络
· 网络访问中断大排查
· FTTx光纤接入
 · 教你使用Anti ARP Sniff..
· 网络嗅探教程：使用Snif..
· 常见病毒手工清除方法大..
编程频道 前沿技术
· C++是垃圾语言？！
· 2007年IT界七大抄袭事件
· Java实用开发全集
 · 解析Ajax开发框架 走进A..
· 基于Google Maps与Ajax..
· 基于Google Maps与Ajax..
操作系统 服务器
· 热门 IT 培训认证官方资..
· Ubuntu 中文开源频道
· Solaris基础知识入门
 · 费力不讨好 数据中心主..
· AMD Phenom三核处理器解..
· 51CTO主编推荐经典专题
数据库 存储频道
· 甲骨文Oracle 11g正式发..
· Oracle数据库开发之PL/S..
· Oracle数据库开发基础教..
 · 存储2006，一个并购的大..
· IDC宣布浪潮蝉联存储市..
· 双机热备技术
主编信箱 热线:010-66476606　告诉我们您想看的：专题　文章
关于我们 | 诚聘英才 | 联系我们 | 网站大事 | 意见反馈 | 网站地图
Copyright©2005-2007 51CTO.COM 版权所有